| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1623
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 08:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bring logi. Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1625
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 10:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Because in RL if a freighter sees a bunch of small boats assembling they call one of the navy fleets patrolling nearby and if those small boats don't have a good reason or are armed they get warned and then wtfpwned. In EvE the Navy just sits there and even let's the pirates scoop the loot. Completely different. Freighter pilots are capable of calling the navy for support as long as it they don't expect support from an NPC faction navy, just like RL. Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1625
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 13:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:How about every time a cap ship is solo it reverts to 300,000 EHP. If it dies (cus it was ratting) its the pilots fault for not having remote reps, scouts, webbers and instantly deployables cyno alts. Are you implying ratting carriers don't get ganked? Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1625
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 13:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
I wonder how long 15 catalysts would last against a smartbombing battleship or two. Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1625
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 13:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
I guess 2 battleships could easily alpha the whole fleet of Catalysts for roughly the same cost. Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1625
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 14:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:There is when it comes to ganking. Why don't people gank in cruisers but instead use dessies. Cost. People do gank in cruisers.
Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1625
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 14:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Thats balance based on cost. It isn't.
Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1625
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 14:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
S Byerley wrote:I vote we make jump freighters cost the same as a catalyst and be done with it. Could you elaborate on the reasoning behind your proposal? Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1626
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 14:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Lmao. So cost is not a balancing factor but if theres not enough loot to justify the cost you won't gank it. Got it :) So when CCP balance ships, they not only balance them based on the cost of the hulls, but also on the value of the cargo the hull may or may not be carrying. Got it.
Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1626
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 15:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Since the next best thing, cruisers cost 5 x more (due to material costs) ganking freighters overall would be more expensive and overall ganks on freighters would likely decrease. Only temporarily until people train up to fly a Brutix or Talos. Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1626
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 16:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Which is why freighters need a HP buff or tank fitting ability. To drive up the cost of ganking to a point it was originally at, profitable to gank a pi+Ķata but not an empty freighter or just carrying a typical cargo. How much of a buff does it need? Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1626
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 16:24:00 -
[12] - Quote
S Byerley wrote:The other direction would be a balancing factor is a material requirement. That doesn't make sense to me. No, the material requirement is a result of balance, not the other way. Also you might want to edit out your offensive remark.
Oh god. |

Riot Girl
Krypteia Operations
1628
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 18:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
Qolde wrote:It is sort of silly to have a hauler so big and defenseless that ANYTHING you can fill it with is a bad idea. that's as broken as a 600M isk battleship that can't kill any other battleships. It's not defenceless though. It can be defended for a comparatively small cost.
Oh god. |
| |
|